ABSTRACT: This article, written as a critical dialogue between 2 interlocutors, puts forward a number of arguments justifying and criticizing the practice of university ranking. It draws attention to 3 key problematics: the ideological construction of institutional ranking as a professionally necessary and inevitable activity, the symbolically violent character of ranking as a form of social categorization and hierarchization, and the possibility of denying the system legitimacy by practicing more prefigurative forms of its critique. Through the progression of this dialogue, the article ultimately makes a case for turning away from university rankings on both scientific and ethico-political grounds.
KEY WORDS: University ranking · Academic capitalism · Governmentality · Prefigurative politics · Symbolic violence · Denaturalization
Full text in pdf format | Cite this article as: Amsler S
(2014) University ranking: a dialogue on turning towards alternatives. Ethics Sci Environ Polit 13:155-166. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00136
Export citation Share: Facebook - - linkedIn |
Previous article Next article |