Inter-Research > ESR > v52 > p189-201  
ESR
Endangered Species Research

via Mailchimp

ESR 52:189-201 (2023)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01273

A focus on flatback turtles: the social acceptability of conservation interventions in two Australian case studies

Ingrid E. van Putten1,2,*, Christopher Cvitanovic3, Paris Tuohy4, Ruby Annand-Jones5, Michael Dunlop6, Alistair J. Hobday1,2, Linda Thomas1, Shane A. Richards7

1CSIRO Environment, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
2Centre for Marine Socio-ecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
3School of Business, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2600, Australia
4Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
5Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601,Australia
6CSIRO Environment, Black Mountain, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
7School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Human-induced climate change is a threat to marine species and ecosystems worldwide, including sea turtles. As climate changes are projected to intensify, directed management and intervention is required to safeguard the future of vulnerable species and ecosystems. Prioritisation tools that explore the cost-benefit-risk can help in the choice of interventions. However, an often-overlooked element underpinning the success of directed interventions is the extent to which they are perceived as acceptable by local communities (i.e. social acceptability). We assess the social acceptability for a range of adaptation interventions for flatback turtles Natator depressus (FBTs) in north-western Australia. A survey of residents in Port Hedland and Broome showed that FBTs are important to the identity of both towns and local FBT decline or extinction would have negative local social and economic impacts. In both locations, survey respondents expressed strong support for intervening to protect FBTs and there was broad agreement between respondents from both locations on the most and least acceptable interventions. For example, in both locations the most acceptable intervention was to restrict 4-wheel-drive beach access for locals and visitors and the least acceptable was to intervene genetically in the FBT populations. In the case of FBT conservation in Port Hedland and Broome, (1) interventions that limit human behaviour, as opposed to interfering with the species themselves, are likely to be most socially acceptable, and therefore (2) are also most likely to be implemented successfully and avoid conflicts within the community.


KEY WORDS: Adaptation · Climate change · Social acceptability · Natator depressus


Full text in pdf format
Supplement 1
Supplement 2
Cite this article as: van Putten IE, Cvitanovic C, Tuohy P, Annand-Jones R and others (2023) A focus on flatback turtles: the social acceptability of conservation interventions in two Australian case studies. Endang Species Res 52:189-201. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01273

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article