Inter-Research > MEPS > v732 > p135-147  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 732:135-147 (2024)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14528

Limited effects of management and ecological subsidies on the size-spectra of kelp forest fish communities

Simon Gartenstein1,2,3,4,*, Alejandro Pérez-Matus5,6, Freddie J. Heather7, Natalio Godoy8, Felipe Torres-Cañete8, Alexis M. Catalán9, Nelson Valdivia1,10

1Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, 5690000 Valdivia, Chile
2Programa de Doctorado en Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, 5690000 Valdivia, Chile
3The Rufford Foundation, 6th floor, 250 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7QZ, UK
4The Nature Conservancy, Marchant Pereira 367, of. 801, Providencia, 7500557 Santiago, Chile
5Subtidal Ecology Laboratory, Estación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 114-D, 8331150 Santiago, Chile
6Millennium Nucleus for Ecology and Conservation of Temperate, Mesophotic Reef Ecosystem (NUTME), 2340000 Valparaiso, Chile
7Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Hobart 7004, Tasmania, Australia
8The Nature Conservancy, Marchant Pereira 367, of. 801, Providencia, 7500557 Santiago, Chile
9Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP), Moraleda 16, 5951601 Coyhaique, Chile
10Centro FONDAP de Investigación de Dinámicas de Ecosistemas Marinos de Altas Latitudes (IDEAL), Universidad Austral de Chile, 5090000 Valdivia, Chile
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Animal body size influences key ecological processes across biological hierarchies. For instance, densities (N) and community biomass (B) are allometric functions of body mass (M). Energetic equivalence predicts that density scales with body size as NM-0.75 and that biomass scales with body size as BM0.25. However, the way fish size-spectra are influenced by external processes, such as ecological subsidies (e.g. nutrients from upwelling zones) and fisheries management, is not well understood. We investigated the relationship of body size with density and biomass of reef fishes associated with subtidal kelp forests of Lessonia trabeculata that were influenced by the separate and interactive effects of management (Territorial Use Rights for Fisheries [TURF] or open access) and upwelling regimes (upwelling or non-upwelling zones). Fish densities and lengths were recorded using underwater visual censuses. Within each of 4 locations, paired TURF and open-access sites were surveyed. We surveyed 18 fish species, encompassing 1511 individuals ranging between 2 and 6639 g. We observed that fish size-spectra deviated from energetic equivalence, as NM-0.32 and BM2.2, indicating that the contribution of large-sized fishes to community density and biomass was greater than that predicted by energetic equivalence. Multi-model inference suggested that TURF and upwelling scenarios had weak effects on fish size-spectra. Results indicated that fish communities may have access to external food sources beyond local kelp forests. In addition, size-spectra may be a spatially persistent attribute of these fish communities.


KEY WORDS: Size spectra · Temperate reef fish · Upwelling · TURF · Open access · Fishing areas


Full text in pdf format
Cite this article as: Gartenstein S, Pérez-Matus A, Heather FJ, Godoy N, Torres-Cañete F, Catalán AM, Valdivia N (2024) Limited effects of management and ecological subsidies on the size-spectra of kelp forest fish communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 732:135-147. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14528

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article